Mary Vs. Alemma

Mary vs Alemma

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 07, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1011222
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph
Decided On: Jan 07, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mary

Respondent

Alemma

Excerpt

.....the petitioner. ext.p-3 : copy of the affidavit and petition ia924/12 in os176/10 dated 20 8.2012 by the petitioner. respondents' exhibits : nil / true copy / ns p.a. to judge thomas p. joseph, j.===================== original petition (civil) no.65 of 2013 ============================== dated this the 7th day of january, 2013 judgment this original petition is for early disposal of ext.p1, application - i.a. no. 1313 of 2012 in o.s. no. 176 of 2010 for passing a final decree. the learned counsel submits that the application was posted on 15.03.2012 for appearance of the respondents. of them, respondents 1 to 3 appeared and the 4th respondent was later served but did not appear. grievance is that the final decree application is being posted for objection on the request of the respondents 1 to 3. if any such 2. it is open to the petitioner to request the learned munsiff, pala for expeditious disposal of the final decree application. if any such request is made by the petitioner, learned munsiff shall consider that request and pass appropriate order. original petition is disposed of with the above observation. sd/- thomas p.joseph, judge //true copy// smv p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 17TH POUSHA 193 OP(C).No. 65 of 2013 (O) ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.176/2010 DATED 14 02-2012 ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- MARY, W/O.MATHEW, KAVUKATTU VEETTIL, PERUNTHANAM KARA, UZHAVOOR VILLAGE AND POST, MEENACHIL TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. ALEMMA, D/O.CHERIAN, KAVUKATTU VEETIL, PERUMTHANAM KARA, UZHAVOOR VILLAGE AND POST, MEENACHIL TALUK ”

589.

2. SCARIA, S/O.CHERIAN, KAVUKATTU VEETIL, PERUMTHANAM KARA, UZHAVOOR VILLAGE AND POST, MEENACHIL TALUK ”

589.

3. MARY, W/O.P.A.JOSE, PAINADATHU VEETTIL, KARUKUTTIYIL, PARAPURAM KARA, ANGAMALY VILLAGE,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT”

572.

4. LUCY CHACKO, W/O.CHACKO, POCHIM VIHAR, B.G. 6/103C, NEW DELHI”

011. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: NS OP(C).No. 65 of 2013 (O) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P-1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION IA 313/12 IN OS NO.176/10 DATED 14 2.2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR PASSING OF FINAL DECREE. EXT.P-2 : COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION IA 933/12 IN OS NO.176/10 DATED 20 8.2012 BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P-3 : COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION IA924/12 IN OS176/10 DATED 20 8.2012 BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL / TRUE COPY / NS P.A. TO JUDGE THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

===================== Original Petition (civil) No.65 of 2013 ============================== Dated this the 7th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT This original petition is for early disposal of Ext.P1, application - I.A. No. 1313 of 2012 in O.S. No. 176 of 2010 for passing a final decree. The learned counsel submits that the application was posted on 15.03.2012 for appearance of the respondents. Of them, respondents 1 to 3 appeared and the 4th respondent was later served but did not appear. Grievance is that the final decree application is being posted for objection on the request of the respondents 1 to 3. If any such 2. It is open to the petitioner to request the learned Munsiff, Pala for expeditious disposal of the final decree application. If any such request is made by the petitioner, learned Munsiff shall consider that request and pass appropriate order. Original petition is disposed of with the above observation. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE //True copy// smv P.A. To Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Mary vs Alemma Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph