Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V.A.Thomas Vs. State of Kerala

V.A.Thomas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 07, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011155

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.A.Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.bhavadasan monday, the 7th day of january 2013 17th pousha 193 bail appl..no. 9834 of 2012 () ------------------------------ (crime no.668/2012 of pulikeezhu police station, pathanamthitta) ...... petitioner(s)/accused 1 to 3.--------------------------------------------------- 1. v.a.thomas @ thankachan, aged 7 years, s/o.late abraham, vakkyapallathu bethel house, kallunkal p.o., thiruvalla, pathanamthitta district.2. abraham v.thomas @ aji, aged 3 years, s/o.thomas, vakkyapallathu bethel house, kallunkal p.o., thiruvalla, pathanamthitta district.3. abraham thomas @ kunjavarachan, aged 6 years, s/o.late a.k.thomas, vettikkattil house, kallunkal p.o., thiruvalla, pathanamthitta district. by advs.sri.v.philip mathews sri.gibi.c.george respondent(s)/state: `------------------------------------ state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. by public prosecutor sri.v.s.sreejith this bail application having come up for admission on 07-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: kss p.bhavadasan, j ----------------------------------------- b.a no.9834 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- dated this the 7th day of january, 2013 order the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the bail has already been granted and the petition has become infructuous. accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. p.bhavadasan judge ab :2.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 17TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9834 of 2012 () ------------------------------ (CRIME NO.668/2012 OF PULIKEEZHU POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA) ...... PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 TO 3.--------------------------------------------------- 1. V.A.THOMAS @ THANKACHAN, AGED 7 YEARS, S/O.LATE ABRAHAM, VAKKYAPALLATHU BETHEL HOUSE, KALLUNKAL P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

2. ABRAHAM V.THOMAS @ AJI, AGED 3 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, VAKKYAPALLATHU BETHEL HOUSE, KALLUNKAL P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

3. ABRAHAM THOMAS @ KUNJAVARACHAN, AGED 6 YEARS, S/O.LATE A.K.THOMAS, VETTIKKATTIL HOUSE, KALLUNKAL P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S)/STATE: `------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J ----------------------------------------- B.A No.9834 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2013 ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the bail has already been granted and the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.BHAVADASAN Judge ab :

2.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial