Knowles Vs. Florida

Knowles vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-07-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101111

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101111
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-07-1965
Case Number: 381 U.S. 763
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Knowles

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

knowles v. florida - 381 u.s. 763 (1965) u.s. supreme court knowles v. florida, 381 u.s. 763 (1965) 381 u.s. 763 knowles v. florida. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of florida. no. 884, misc. decided june 7, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. petitioner pro se. earl faircloth, attorney general of florida, and george r. georgieff, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. raley v. ohio, 360 u.s. 423, 437 -440. cf. lane v. brown, 372 u.s. 477 ; douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . mr. justice stewart would deny certiorari. mr. justice clark and mr. justice harlan dissent. page 381 u.s. 763, 1

Full Judgment

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA - 381 U.S. 763 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965) 381 U.S. 763

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437 -440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 763, 1

Same Parties Knowles vs Florida Same Subject Miscellaneous