Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prakashan Vs. Secretary

Prakashan vs Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 03, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1010358

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prakashan

Respondent

Secretary

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh thursday, the 3rd day of january 2013 13th pousha 193 wp(c).no. 311 of 2013 (l) ------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------- prakashan, s/o. govindan maneyil house, sankaranellur p.o. thalassery, kannur district. by adv. sri.i.dinesh menon respondent(s): -------------- the secretary regional transport authority, kannur 67 003. by senior government pleader sri. p.m. saneer this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 03-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 311/2013 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits exhibit p1 : true copy of the proceedings dated 17 04.2012 granting regular permit to the petitioner. exhibit p2 : true copy of the letter producing current records of the vehicle dated 27 10.2012. exhibit p3 : true copy of the judgment in wp(c) no. 20400/2012 dated 17 09.2012. respondent(s) exhibits : nil /true copy/ p.a. to judge. v. chitambaresh, j -------------------------------- wp(c) no. 311 of 201.------------------------------------ dated this the 3rd day of january, 2013 judgment the only prayer urged at the time of hearing is for a direction to issue the granted permit after settlement of timings.2. the respondent is directed to issue the permit granted to the petitioner pursuant to ext.p1 decision of the regional transport authority. the same shall be done after settlement of timings within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. the writ petition is disposed of. v. chitambaresh judge ncd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013 13TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 311 of 2013 (L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- PRAKASHAN, S/O. GOVINDAN MANEYIL HOUSE, SANKARANELLUR P.O. THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR 67 003. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M. SANEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 311/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 17 04.2012 GRANTING REGULAR PERMIT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER PRODUCING CURRENT RECORDS OF THE VEHICLE DATED 27 10.2012. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 20400/2012 DATED 17 09.2012. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 311 OF 201.------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT The only prayer urged at the time of hearing is for a direction to issue the granted permit after settlement of timings.

2. The respondent is directed to issue the permit granted to the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 decision of the Regional Transport Authority. The same shall be done after settlement of timings within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial