Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Diamond Vs. Louisiana

Diamond vs Louisiana

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100973

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 201
Subject
Intellectual Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Intellectual Property

Key legal issue
Intellectual Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Diamond

Respondent

Louisiana

Excerpt

diamond v. louisiana - 376 u.s. 201 (1964) u.s. supreme court diamond v. louisiana, 376 u.s. 201 (1964) 376 u.s. 201 diamond v. louisiana. certiorari to the supreme court of louisiana. no. 100. argued february 20, 1964. decided february 24, 1964. certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. james m. nabrit iii argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief were jack greenberg, wiley a. branton and johnnie a. jones. ralph l. roy argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was jack p. f. gremillion, attorney general of louisiana. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 376 u.s. 201, 202

Full Judgment

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA - 376 U.S. 201 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA, 376 U.S. 201 (1964) 376 U.S. 201

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 100.
Argued February 20, 1964.
Decided February 24, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 376 U.S. 201, 202



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial