Prasad Vs. State of Kerala

Prasad vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009668

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1009668
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Decided On: Dec 20, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prasad

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....3087.of 2012.the court on the same day delivered the following: dsv/- wp(c).no. 30833 of 2012 (d) appendix petitioner(s) exhibits : exhibit p1: copy of the proceedings before the 3rd respondent. exhibit p2: copy of the memorandum of appeal no.29292/2011 before the second respondent, dated 13 11.2011. respondents' exhibits : nil // true copy // p.a. to judge dsv/- t.r.ramachandran nair, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c).nos. 30833, 30873, 30874 & 30877 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment all these writ petitions are filed by the respective petitioners seeking for a direction to dispose of the appeals pending before the second respondent, within a time frame.2. the petitioners are aggrieved by the proceedings initiated under the kerala land conservancy act against ext.p1 order issued by the third respondent imposing fine for the alleged trespass. various grounds are stated in the appeal.3. it is upto the second respondent to take appropriate decision in the appeals after notice to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. till the appeals are disposed of, the proceedings for recovery will be kept in abeyance. (t.r.ramachandran nair, judge) kav/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30833 of 2012 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- PRASAD, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O GOPALAN, KADAYIL VEEDU, MARAKKADA MUKKU, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVNANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKIL TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, ALONG WITH W.P(C). NOS.30877, 30874 AND 3087.OF 2012.THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- WP(C).No. 30833 of 2012 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL NO.29292/2011 BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT, DATED 13 11.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DSV/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).Nos. 30833, 30873, 30874 & 30877 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2012 JUDGMENT All these writ petitions are filed by the respective petitioners seeking for a direction to dispose of the appeals pending before the second respondent, within a time frame.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the proceedings initiated under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act against Ext.P1 order issued by the third respondent imposing fine for the alleged trespass. Various grounds are stated in the appeal.

3. It is upto the second respondent to take appropriate decision in the appeals after notice to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Till the appeals are disposed of, the proceedings for recovery will be kept in abeyance. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Prasad vs State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair