Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9759 of 2012 ----------------------------------------- CRMP.3169/2012 of SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD CP.36/2012 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, PALAKKAD CRIME NO. 208/2012 OF PALAKKAD TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT ......................................................... APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO.3: ------------------------------------------ ABDUL RASHEED, AGED 2 YEARS S/O. UMMER, KALLAMKODE ORIKKALIL VEEDU ELLATHUPARAMBU, PIRAYIRI PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENTS /DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/CW2 & STATE: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ABHUTHAHIR, AGED 2 YEARS S/O. HAMSA, POOCHINGAL VEEDU, PEZHUMKARA PALLIPURAM.P.O., PALAKKAD PIN-679305.
2. SAUKATHALI, AGED 2 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM, ANAKKAL VEEDU, PEZHUMKARA PALLIPURAM.P.O., PALAKKAD-679305.
3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682031. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: DCS P.BHAVADASAN, J.
---------------------------------------------------- BA No.9759 of 2012 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December 2012 Order The petitioner is the third accused in Crime No.36/12 of Palakkad Town North Police Station for having committed the offences punishable under Ss.341, 324, 307 r/w 34 IPC. The prosecution allegation is that the petitioner along with the other accused, wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant and caused grievous injuries to him, using dangerous weapons. The petitioner submits that he is totally innocent and has been implicated with ulterior motives.
2. The defacto complainant entered appearance through counsel. It was submitted on behalf of the complainant and the matter has been settled between the parties and that the defacto complainant has no further grievance in the matter. If that be so, the application is only to be allowed. The application is accordingly allowed and the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions : BA 9759/1”
1. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the JFCM-II, Palakkad.
2. The learned Magistrate shall ensure the identity of the sureties and the veracity of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, before granting bail to the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Wednesday between 9 am and 11 am, till final report is filed.
4. The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence and influence or try to influence the witnesses.
5. If any of the conditions is violated, the bail granted shall stand cancelled and the JFCM concerned on being satisfied of the said fact, may take such action as available to him in law. P.Bhavadasan, Judge sta BA 9759/12 3