Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A.K.Krishnan Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam

A.K.Krishnan vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.K.Krishnan

Respondent

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam

Excerpt

.....this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 20-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: tss w.p.(c) no.30884/2012 appendix petitioner's exhibits:- p1:- copy of the settlement deed in respect of the property. p2:- copy of the representation dtd 23.11.2012. respondent's exhibits:- nil //true copy// p.s. to judge tss t.r.ramachandran nair, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c).no. 30884 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment the petitioners' complaint is that in spite of the filing of a representation as per ext.p2 pointing out the violations of the provisions of the kerala land utilisation order and the kerala conservation of paddy land and wet land act, no further action is being taken by the first respondent.2. heard learned government pleader also.3. in the light of the direction proposed to be issued, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondents 3 and 4, as this court is not going into the merits of the contentions.4. there will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on ext.p2 after due enquiry and after hearing the petitioners and respondents 2 to 4, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. the writ petition is disposed of as above. no costs. (t.r.ramachandran nair, judge) kav/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30884 of 2012 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. A.K.KRISHNAN, ASARIPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYMANAM,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

2. JAYAMMA, W/O.A.K.KRISHNAN,ASARIPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYMANAM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.N.RAGHURAJ BIJU SUKUMARAN K.AMMINIKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM.

2. TIJO MATHEW, S/O.MATHAI,NOW AT DUBLIN IRELAND FROM MOOLAKKATTU HOUSE,AYMANAM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

3. MANJU MANI, W/O.TIJO MATHEW,NOW AT DUBLIN IRELAND FROM MOOLAKKATTU HOUSE,AYMANAM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

4. JUSTIN MATHEW, MOOLAKKATTU HOUSE,AYMANAM,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.30884/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1:- COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY. P2:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 23.11.2012. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 30884 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2012 JUDGMENT The petitioners' complaint is that in spite of the filing of a representation as per Ext.P2 pointing out the violations of the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order and the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, no further action is being taken by the first respondent.

2. Heard learned Government Pleader also.

3. In the light of the direction proposed to be issued, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondents 3 and 4, as this Court is not going into the merits of the contentions.

4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 after due enquiry and after hearing the petitioners and respondents 2 to 4, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties A.K.Krishnan vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales