Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vishnu Darshan Vs. CochIn University of Science and Technology

Vishnu Darshan vs CochIn University of Science and Technology

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009616

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue
Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vishnu Darshan

Respondent

CochIn University of Science and Technology

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice t.r.ramachandran nair thursday, the 20th day of december 2012 29th agrahayana 193 wp(c).no. 30296 of 2012 (j) -------------------------------- petitioner: -------------- vishnu darshan,, aged 2 years s/o.sudarsan g., residing at v.s.sadhanam cherunniyoor p.o., dalawa puram, varkkala thiruvananthapuram. by adv. sri.sherry j.thomas respondents: ------------------ 1. cochin university of science and technology, represented by its registrar, cusat campus, kalamassery ”104. 2. controller of examinations, cusat, kalamassery ”104. by adv. sri.p.m.a.kalam,sc,cochin university of science and technology. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 20-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.30296/2012 a p p e n d i x petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1. true copy of proceedings dated 23 07.2012. exhibit p2. the true copy of the representation dated 03 12.12 submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. respondent's exhibits: nil. // true copy // p.a. to judge. smp t.r. ramachandran nair, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.30296 of 201.--------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of december, 2012. judgment the petitioner was a b.tech student under the 1st respondent university. he had applied for improvement of one of the internal examinations and accordingly appeared in the examination also. the prayer is for a direction to the university to issue the mark list of the internal examination semester - v for the subject cs-506. the requirement of the petitioner is that he is expecting a job. ext.p2 is a copy of the representation filed by the petitioner.2. learned standing counsel for the university submitted that a consolidated mark list will be issued only after the final results are published along with the main examination in april 2013.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unless the marks are co

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30296 of 2012 (J) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- VISHNU DARSHAN,, AGED 2 YEARS S/O.SUDARSAN G., RESIDING AT V.S.SADHANAM CHERUNNIYOOR P.O., DALAWA PURAM, VARKKALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHERRY J.

THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CUSAT CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY ”

104.

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CUSAT, KALAMASSERY ”

104. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.A.KALAM,SC,COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.30296/2012 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 23 07.2012. EXHIBIT P2. THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03 12.12 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.30296 OF 201.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012. JUDGMENT

The petitioner was a B.Tech student under the 1st respondent University. He had applied for improvement of one of the internal examinations and accordingly appeared in the examination also. The prayer is for a direction to the University to issue the mark list of the internal examination Semester - V for the subject CS-506. The requirement of the petitioner is that he is expecting a job. Ext.P2 is a copy of the representation filed by the petitioner.

2. Learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that a consolidated mark list will be issued only after the final results are published along with the main examination in April 2013.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unless the marks are communicated urgently, it will cause hardship to the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.30296/2012 2 Therefore, if the petitioner files an application for communication of marks confidentially along with required fee, the same will be duly complied with. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE smp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial