Akkamma Vs. Vijayamma

Akkamma vs Vijayamma

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009604

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1009604
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph
Decided On: Dec 20, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Akkamma

Respondent

Vijayamma

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thomas p.joseph thursday, the 20th day of december 2012 29th agrahayana 193 sa.no. 785 of 1997 ( ) ---------------------- as.121/1993 of addl.district court-i,mavelikkara os.303/1990 of munsiff's court,chengannur ....... appellant(s):appellant/plaintiff: ----------------------------------------------------------- akkamma, elanjikkal veettil, piralasseri muri, mulakkuzha village, chengannur taluk. by advs.sri.shaji oommen sri.mathew skaria respondent(s):respondents/defendants 1 to 8.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. vijayamma, w/o.raghavan achary, pynummoottil purayidathil, piralasseri muri, mulakkuzha village, chengannur taluk from kaleekkal melathil, valiyamkara, perinadu village, kollam taluk.2. yoannan, kattazhathil of do...do...3. annamma oommen, thekkedathu, peedikapparambil of ...do...do...., c/o. saramma geevarghese, t.c.14/1700 (1), van rose junction, thiruvananthapuram.4. mariamma, malayil pynnummoottil of ...do..do...5. geevarghese, kaduthasseril of ..do...do...6. eapen george, kinattumkara veettil of ..do..do...7. p.m.narayanan, pallickal padinjattathil of ..do..do...8. c.c.madhavi, w/o.narayanan of ..do..do.... r2,r5 & r7 by adv. sri.k.gopalakrishna kurup r3 by adv. sri.v.praveen this second appeal having been finally heard on 20-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: kss thomas p. joseph, j.===================== s.a. no. 785 of 1997 ============================== dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment advocate sri. m.k. sasikumar representing advocate sri. mathew skaria, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous and hence the appeal is not pressed.2. the submission is recorded. second appeal is dismissed as not pressed without any order as to cost. sd/- thomas p.joseph, judge smv //true copy// p.a. to judge r.s.a. no. of -:2. :-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 SA.No. 785 of 1997 ( ) ---------------------- AS.121/1993 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA OS.303/1990 of MUNSIFF'S COURT,CHENGANNUR ....... APPELLANT(S):APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------------------------------------------------------- AKKAMMA, ELANJIKKAL VEETTIL, PIRALASSERI MURI, MULAKKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI OOMMEN SRI.MATHEW SKARIA RESPONDENT(S):RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 8.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VIJAYAMMA, W/O.RAGHAVAN ACHARY, PYNUMMOOTTIL PURAYIDATHIL, PIRALASSERI MURI, MULAKKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK FROM KALEEKKAL MELATHIL, VALIYAMKARA, PERINADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK.

2. YOANNAN, KATTAZHATHIL OF DO...DO...

3. ANNAMMA OOMMEN, THEKKEDATHU, PEEDIKAPPARAMBIL OF ...DO...DO...., C/O. SARAMMA GEEVARGHESE, T.C.14/1700 (1), VAN ROSE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. MARIAMMA, MALAYIL PYNNUMMOOTTIL OF ...DO..DO...

5. GEEVARGHESE, KADUTHASSERIL OF ..DO...DO...

6. EAPEN GEORGE, KINATTUMKARA VEETTIL OF ..DO..DO...

7. P.M.NARAYANAN, PALLICKAL PADINJATTATHIL OF ..DO..DO...

8. C.C.MADHAVI, W/O.NARAYANAN OF ..DO..DO.... R2,R5 & R7 BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.PRAVEEN THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

===================== S.A. No. 785 of 1997 ============================== Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT Advocate Sri. M.K. Sasikumar representing Advocate Sri. Mathew Skaria, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous and hence the appeal is not pressed.

2. The submission is recorded. Second appeal is dismissed as not pressed without any order as to cost. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE smv //True copy// P.A. To Judge R.S.A. No. of -:

2. :-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Akkamma vs Vijayamma Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph