Abitha Vs. the Geologist

Abitha vs The Geologist

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009564

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1009564
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Decided On: Dec 20, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abitha

Respondent

The Geologist

Excerpt

.....ext.p3 a true copy of the communication no. c1-17464/12(5) dt. 9- 11-2012 issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner. ext.p4 a true copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent dt. 30-11-2012. /true copy/ sd/- p.a. to judge mrcs t.r. ramachandran nair, j.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ w.p.(c). no.30920/2012 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment the petitioner is having certain items of properties as prescribed in para.1 of the writ petition. mutation has already been effected also after the execution of ext.p1 sale deed. for constructing a house, the petitioner had to remove soil and he applied for permit. ext.p3 communication was received by the petitioner in the matter and based on the same, the petitioner filed an application before the first respondent as per ext.p4.2. it is submitted that the first respondent is not taking any action in the matter.3. in accordance with the relevant provisions under the kerala minor mineral concession rules, the first respondent will take appropriate decision within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. the writ petition is disposed of as above. no costs. sd/- (t.r. ramachandran nair, judge.) ms

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30920 of 2012 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- ABHITHA, W/O.VISWANATHAN, KALLAYIL VEEDU, CHERUVATHANI THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, THRISSUR.

2. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THALAPPALLY, VADAKKANCHERRY THRISSUR DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30920 of 2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 1931/1998 OF S.R.O. ERUMAPETTY 10 12-1998. EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF EXT.P1 PROPERTY DT. 17-11-2012 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PILAKKAD VILLAGE. EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. C1-17464/12(5) DT. 9- 11-2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 30-11-2012. /true copy/ sd/- P.A. To Judge mrcs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.30920/2012 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT

The petitioner is having certain items of properties as prescribed in para.1 of the writ petition. Mutation has already been effected also after the execution of Ext.P1 sale deed. For constructing a house, the petitioner had to remove soil and he applied for permit. Ext.P3 communication was received by the petitioner in the matter and based on the same, the petitioner filed an application before the first respondent as per Ext.P4.

2. It is submitted that the first respondent is not taking any action in the matter.

3. In accordance with the relevant provisions under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, the first respondent will take appropriate decision within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this Judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Abitha vs The Geologist Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair