Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SunithA.G. Vs. the State of Kerala

SunithA.G. vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009559

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SunithA.G.

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....devaswom board this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 20-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: jm wp(c).no. 30922 of 2012 appendix petitioner's exhibits: p1- true copy of the approved appointment order dated 7 8.2003. p2- true copy of the provisional list of rules 51 claimants as on 1.6.2008 published by respondent no.5. p3- true copy of the order dated 21 6.2012 issued by respondent no.5. p4- true copy of the government order bearing go(ms) no.42/2011/g.edn. dated 16 2.2011. p5- true copy of the judgment dated 14 2.2008 passed by a division benchg of this hon'ble court in wa.no.394/2008. p5(a)- true copy of the representation dated 24 11.2012 (excluding the annexures) submitted by the petitioner before respondent no.5. p6- true copy of the order dated 11 12.2012 issued by respondent no.5. p7- true copy of the revision petition submitted by the petitioner before respondent no.2 dated 12 12.2012. respondents' exhibits : nil \\ true copy \\ pa to judge jm p.r. ramachandra menon, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c). no. 30922 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment the petitioner was originally appointed as a 'upsa', as per ext.p1 order dated 7.8.2003. subsequently, the service of the petitioner came to be retrenched by the 5th respondent as per ext.p6 order dated 11.12.2012, which in turn has been subjected to challenge by filing ext.p7 revision petition and the same is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer is to cause ext.p7 to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.2. heard the learned government pleader for and also the learned standing counsel for the 3rd respondent.3. considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the 6th respondent. the writ petition is disposed of, directing the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30922 of 2012 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- SUNITHA.G.,, AGED 3 YEARS W/O.R.G.PRASAD, PADICKALEMANNIL HOUSE AYROOR SOUTH.P.O, THIRUVALLA PATHANAMTHITTA (UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (RETRENCHED) DEVASWOM BOARD UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ANGADICKAL NORTH). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DEIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM”

001.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER ATTINGAL-695 001.

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHENGANNUR.

5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOLS/SECRETARY TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BUILDING NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

6. ADARSH, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, HINDU UP SCHOOL ERAMALLIKARA.

7. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.T.LILLY R5 BY SRI.G.BIJU,SC,TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jm WP(C).No. 30922 of 2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 7 8.2003. P2- TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL LIST OF RULES 51 CLAIMANTS AS ON 1.6.2008 PUBLISHED BY RESPONDENT NO.5. P3- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21 6.2012 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5. P4- TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING GO(MS) NO.42/2011/G.EDN. DATED 16 2.2011. P5- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14 2.2008 PASSED BY A DIVISION BENCHG OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA.NO.394/2008. P5(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24 11.2012 (EXCLUDING THE ANNEXURES) SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.5. P6- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11 12.2012 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5. P7- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 12 12.2012. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL \\ TRUE COPY \\ PA TO JUDGE jm P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 30922 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT The petitioner was originally appointed as a 'UPSA', as per Ext.P1 order dated 7.8.2003. Subsequently, the service of the petitioner came to be retrenched by the 5th respondent as per Ext.P6 order dated 11.12.2012, which in turn has been subjected to challenge by filing Ext.P7 revision petition and the same is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer is to cause Ext.P7 to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader for and also the learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the 6th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass appropriate orders after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a W.P.C. No. 30922 of 2012 -2- copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Kp/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial