Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Babujan Vs. the K.S.E. Board and Others

S.Babujan vs The K.S.E. Board and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Babujan

Respondent

The K.S.E. Board and Others

Excerpt

.....petitioner's exhibits: ext.p1 : true copy of the memo of charges no.ebvs- 4/37/2005/75 dated 23 01.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner. ext.p2 : true copy of the reply dated 18 03.2006 submitted by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent. ext.p3 : true copy of show cause notice no.ebvs- 4/37/2005/775 dated 27 10.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner. ext.p4 : true copy of the reply dated 05 12.2006 submitted by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent. ext.p5 : true copy of the order no.vig. bii- 3649/2005/1022 dated 16 04.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent. ext.p6 : true copy of the appeal dated 31 05.2007 submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent board. ext.p7 : true copy of the order bo(fb) no.2435/07 (bill.36492005)/2938 dated 26 10.2007 issued by the 1st respondent. respondents' exhibits: nil //true copy// p.a. to judge rv b.p. ray, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c) no.37346 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 20th day of december, 2012. judgment the petitioner challenges exts.p5 and p7 orders whereby one increment of the petitioner without cumulative effect was barred for six months, in consequence of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner. the 2nd respondent has filed an affidavit stating that the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner has been dropped. therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. accordingly, this writ petition is closed. sd/- b.p. ray, judge. rv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 37346 of 2007 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- S.BABUJAN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) 66 K.V. SUB STATION, K.S.E.BOARD, MUNDAKKAYAM. BY ADVS.SRI.KRB.KAIMAL (SR.) SRI.ANIL K.NAIR SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.PRAMJI PAUL VAZHAPPILLY RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE K.S.E.BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE CHAIRMAN, K.S.E.BOARD, -DO- -DO- 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M) -DO- -DO- R1TO3 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB R1-3 BY ADV. SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, SC, KSEB BY ADV. SRI.PULIKOOL ABUBACKER, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 37346 of 2007 (U) :

2. : APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES NO.EBVS- 4/37/2005/75 DATED 23 01.2006 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 18 03.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.EBVS- 4/37/2005/775 DATED 27 10.2006 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 05 12.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.VIG. BII- 3649/2005/1022 DATED 16 04.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 31 05.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BOARD. EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BO(FB) NO.2435/07 (BILL.36492005)/2938 DATED 26 10.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rv B.P. RAY, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.37346 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Exts.P5 and P7 orders whereby one increment of the petitioner without cumulative effect was barred for six months, in consequence of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner. The 2nd respondent has filed an affidavit stating that the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner has been dropped. Therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial