Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Santhosh Kumar Vs. the Managing Director,kochi Refineries

S.Santhosh Kumar vs The Managing Director,kochi Refineries

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009462

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Santhosh Kumar

Respondent

The Managing Director,kochi Refineries

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice b.p.ray thursday, the 20th day of december 2012 29th agrahayana 193 wp(c).no. 12762 of 2006 (t) --------------------------- petitioner --------------- s.santhosh kumar, tc-66/87, "revathi", mosque lane,pachalloor p.o.,thiruvananthapuram. by advs.sri.j.julian xavier sri.firoz k.robin respondent: ---------------- the managing director, kochi refineries ltd.,ambalamughal,kochi. r1 by adv. sri.e.k.nandakumar r1 by adv. sri.a.k.jayasankar nambiar this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 20-12-2012, along with wpc. 34402/2006, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.p. ray, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c) no. 12762 & 34402 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 20th day of december, 2012. judgment heard both sides. on a reading of the prayers in the writ petitions, it appears that due to the lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous. accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. it is open to the petitioners to approach this court, if fresh cause of action arises. sd/- b.p. ray, judge. rv /true copy/ p.a to judge.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 12762 of 2006 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER --------------- S.SANTHOSH KUMAR, TC-66/87, "REVATHI", MOSQUE LANE,PACHALLOOR P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENT: ---------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOCHI REFINERIES LTD.,AMBALAMUGHAL,KOCHI. R1 BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-12-2012, ALONG WITH WPC. 34402/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.P. RAY, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 12762 & 34402 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of December, 2012. JUDGMENT Heard both sides. On a reading of the prayers in the writ petitions, it appears that due to the lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. It is open to the petitioners to approach this Court, if fresh cause of action arises. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv /True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial