Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hamilton Vs. Alabama

Hamilton vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-30-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100943

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 650
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hamilton

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

hamilton v. alabama - 376 u.s. 650 (1964) u.s. supreme court hamilton v. alabama, 376 u.s. 650 (1964) 376 u.s. 650 hamilton v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 793. decided march 30, 1964. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 275 ala. 574, 156 so.2d 926. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii and oscar w. adams, jr. for petitioner. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and bernard f. sykes and owen bridges, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is reversed. johnson v. virginia, 373 u.s. 61 . mr. justice black concurs in reversal of the judgment of contempt for reasons discussed in in re murchison, 349 u.s. 133 , in re oliver, 333 u.s. 257 , and thompson v. city of louisville, 362 u.s. 199 . cf. offutt v. united states, 348 u.s. 11 . mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 376 u.s. 650, 651

Full Judgment

HAMILTON v. ALABAMA - 376 U.S. 650 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court HAMILTON v. ALABAMA, 376 U.S. 650 (1964) 376 U.S. 650

HAMILTON v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 793.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 275 Ala. 574, 156 So.2d 926.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Oscar W. Adams, Jr. for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes and Owen Bridges, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. Johnson v. Virginia, 373 U.S. 61 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in reversal of the judgment of contempt for reasons discussed in In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 , In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 , and Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 . Cf. Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 376 U.S. 650, 651



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial