Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhaneshwar Rawani Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Represented Through Managing Director and ors

Dhaneshwar Rawani vs Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Represented Through Managing Director and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 18, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008917

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhaneshwar Rawani

Respondent

Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Represented Through Managing Director and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.498of2013 dhaneshwarrawani ..... petitioner versus m/s.bharatcokingcoallimited&ors. . respondents coram: honblemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar forthepetitioner :mr.jitendratripathi,advocate fortherespondents :mr.kaustavpanda,advocate 3/18.07.2013 issuenotice. mr. kaustav panda, learned counsel waives notice on behalfoftherespondents. thepetitionerisdirectedtomakedetailedrepresentation before the respondent no.3 within a period of two weeks and respondentno.3isdirectedtodecidetheclaimofthepetitionerbya reasoned order within a period of further two weeks specifically dealingwitheachandeverycontentionraisedbythepetitioner. acopyofthedecisiontakenbyrespondentno.3should beplacedonrecordimmediatelythereafter. callthematteraftersixweeks. (shreechandrashekhar,j.) r.k.

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.498of2013 DhaneshwarRawani ..... Petitioner Versus M/s.BharatCokingCoalLimited&Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.JitendraTripathi,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.KaustavPanda,Advocate 3/18.07.2013 Issuenotice. Mr. Kaustav Panda, learned counsel waives notice on behalfoftherespondents. Thepetitionerisdirectedtomakedetailedrepresentation before the Respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks and RespondentNo.3isdirectedtodecidetheclaimofthepetitionerbya reasoned order within a period of further two weeks specifically dealingwitheachandeverycontentionraisedbythepetitioner. AcopyofthedecisiontakenbyRespondentNo.3should beplacedonrecordimmediatelythereafter. Callthematteraftersixweeks. (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.K.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial