Zapata Vs. California

Zapata vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-01-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100886

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100886
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-01-1964
Case Number: 377 U.S. 406
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Zapata

Respondent

California

Excerpt

zapata v. california - 377 u.s. 406 (1964) u.s. supreme court zapata v. california, 377 u.s. 406 (1964) 377 u.s. 406 zapata v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, third appellate district. no. 1025, misc. decided june 1, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 220 cal. app. 2d 903, 34 cal. rptr. 171. samuel carter mcmorris for appellant. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, doris h. maier, assistant attorney general, and roger e. venturi, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 377 u.s. 406, 407

Full Judgment

ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA - 377 U.S. 406 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA, 377 U.S. 406 (1964) 377 U.S. 406

ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1025, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 220 Cal. App. 2d 903, 34 Cal. Rptr. 171.

Samuel Carter McMorris for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 377 U.S. 406, 407

Same Parties Zapata vs California Same Subject Miscellaneous