Krishna Murari and ors Vs. Science and Technology

Krishna Murari and ors vs Science and Technology

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008825
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishna Murari and ors

Respondent

Science and Technology

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.s. no. 2934 of 2013 krishna murari & others ..petitioners versus the state of jharkhand & ors. .respondents ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioners : mr. anil kumar sinha, sr. advocate for the respondents : j.c. to g.a. --- i.a. no. 4561 o”05. 31-07-2013 in this i.a., the petitioner has prayed for exemption of payment of more than one set of court fee. it has been submitted that the prayer made in the writ application is identical, and as per the order dated 20.09.2008, passed in wps no. 2928 of 2008 ( annexure-1), only one court fee is required to be paid. the objection of the office is, thus, contrary to the said order. learned j.c. to g.a., appearing on behalf of the respondents, has not controverted the said contention. having heard learned counsel and considering annexure-1 to the i.a., i find substance in the said ground. i.a. is accordingly allowed. petitioners are exempted from paying more than one set of court fee. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) w.p.s. no. 2934 of 2013 two weeks' time, as prayed for by learned counsel for the respondents, is allowed to to file reply to the i.a. no. 4705 of 2013. prayer is allowed. put up this case on 26.08.2013. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 2934 of 2013 Krishna Murari & Others ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.A. --- I.A. No. 4561 o”

05. 31-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for exemption of payment of more than one set of court fee. It has been submitted that the prayer made in the writ application is identical, and as per the order dated 20.09.2008, passed in WPS No. 2928 of 2008 ( Annexure-1), only one court fee is required to be paid. The objection of the office is, thus, contrary to the said order. Learned J.C. to G.A., appearing on behalf of the respondents, has not controverted the said contention. Having heard learned counsel and considering Annexure-1 to the I.A., I find substance in the said ground. I.A. is accordingly allowed. Petitioners are exempted from paying more than one set of court fee. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) W.P.S. No. 2934 of 2013 Two weeks' time, as prayed for by learned counsel for the respondents, is allowed to to file reply to the I.A. No. 4705 of 2013. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case on 26.08.2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Krishna Murari and ors vs Science and Technology Same Subject Education