Fulchand 2 Vs. C C L

Fulchand 2 vs C C L

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008772

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008772
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fulchand 2

Respondent

C C L

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.s. no. 3639 of 2012 fulchand-2 ..petitioner versus m/s c.c.l. & ors. .respondents ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : mr. a.k. sahani, advocate for the respondents : mr. ananda sen, advocate --- i.a. no. 4763 o”04. 31-07-2013 in this i.a., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of w.p.s. no. 3639 of 2012 in terms of the order dated 25.09.2012 passed in w.p.s. no. 6459 of 2007 ( manmohan pandey vs. ccl & ors). it has been submitted that petitioner's case is covered by the said order passed in the case of manmohan pandey ( supra). learned counsel for the respondents opposed the application and submitted that the petitioner's case is not covered by the said order and the same cannot be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the said case. in view of the above, i, therefore, find no ground made out for disposal of w.p.s. no. 3639 of 2012 in the term as prayed for. however, since the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction for payment of pensionary benefits, office is directed to list w.p.s. no. 3639 of 2012 on 26th september, 2013. i.a. is disposed of. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 3639 of 2012 Fulchand-2 ..Petitioner Versus M/s C.C.L. & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate --- I.A. No. 4763 o”

04. 31-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.S. No. 3639 of 2012 in terms of the order dated 25.09.2012 passed in W.P.S. No. 6459 of 2007 ( Manmohan Pandey Vs. CCL & Ors). It has been submitted that petitioner's case is covered by the said order passed in the case of Manmohan Pandey ( Supra). Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the application and submitted that the petitioner's case is not covered by the said order and the same cannot be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the said case. In view of the above, I, therefore, find no ground made out for disposal of W.P.S. No. 3639 of 2012 in the term as prayed for. However, since the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction for payment of pensionary benefits, office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 3639 of 2012 on 26th September, 2013. I.A. is disposed of. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Fulchand 2 vs C C L Same Subject Education