Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. Geeta Devi

Sanjay Kumar vs Geeta Devi

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008742

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar

Respondent

Geeta Devi

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi firstappealno.22of2012 with i.a.no.949of2012 sanjaykumar .... .... .... appellant versus geetadevi .... .... ....respondent coram :hon'blethechiefjustice hon'blemrs.justicejayaroy fortheappellant :mr.anilkumarsinha,advocate fortherespondent : st orderno.06 dated,31 july,2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheappellant. in view of the reasons stated in the interlocutory application,thedelayinfilingofthisfirstappealiscondoned,and thei.a.no.949of2012standsdisposedof. listthiscaseforadmissionaftertwoweeks. (prakashtatia,c.j.) (jayaroy,j.) si/anit

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI FirstAppealNo.22of2012 With I.A.No.949of2012 SanjayKumar .... .... .... Appellant Versus GeetaDevi .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :Mr.AnilKumarSinha,Advocate FortheRespondent : st OrderNo.06 Dated,31 July,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheappellant. In view of the reasons stated in the interlocutory application,thedelayinfilingofthisFirstAppealiscondoned,and theI.A.No.949of2012standsdisposedof. ListthiscaseforAdmissionaftertwoweeks. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial