McnerlIn Vs. Denno

Mcnerlin vs Denno

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100864

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100864
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-22-1964
Case Number: 378 U.S. 575
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mcnerlin

Respondent

Denno

Excerpt

mc nerlin v. denno - 378 u.s. 575 (1964) u.s. supreme court mc nerlin v. denno, 378 u.s. 575 (1964) 378 u.s. 575 mc nerlin v. denno, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 1117, misc. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 324 f.2d 46 . richard j. medalie for petitioner. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and ronald j. offenkrantz, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 575, 576

Full Judgment

Mc NERLIN v. DENNO - 378 U.S. 575 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court Mc NERLIN v. DENNO, 378 U.S. 575 (1964) 378 U.S. 575

Mc NERLIN v. DENNO, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1117, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 324 F.2d 46 .

Richard J. Medalie for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 575, 576

Same Parties Mcnerlin vs Denno Same Subject Land Acquisition