Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Owen Vs. Arizona

Owen vs Arizona

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100863

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 574
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Owen

Respondent

Arizona

Excerpt

owen v. arizona - 378 u.s. 574 (1964) u.s. supreme court owen v. arizona, 378 u.s. 574 (1964) 378 u.s. 574 owen et al. v. arizona. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona. no. 1078, misc. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 94 ariz. 404, 385 p.2d 700; 94 ariz. 413, 385 p.2d 706. petitioners pro se. robert w. pickrell, attorney general of arizona, and norman e. green for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgments of the supreme court of arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 574, 575

Full Judgment

OWEN v. ARIZONA - 378 U.S. 574 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court OWEN v. ARIZONA, 378 U.S. 574 (1964) 378 U.S. 574

OWEN ET AL. v. ARIZONA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 1078, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 94 Ariz. 404, 385 P.2d 700; 94 Ariz. 413, 385 P.2d 706.

Petitioners pro se.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Norman E. Green for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 574, 575



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial