Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md Aaquibe Jawed Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md Aaquibe Jawed vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 24, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Aaquibe Jawed

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 6958 of 2013 md. aaquibe jawed ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... ... ... opposite party --- coram : hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy for the petitioner : mr. rakesh kumar sinha, advocate for the state : a. p. p. 02/24.07.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. the petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120(b) of the indian penal code. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the student of baliapur institute of technology at dhanbad and his date of birth is 05.05.1995, he has just completed 18 years of age. it is also submitted that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co-accused, who has stated about the petitioner that the petitioner is his closed friend and also participated in the theft of the motorcycle. learned counsel for the state has opposed but she has not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner and she has also accepted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, nothing has come against the petitioner. considering the fact that name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad in connection with dhanbad p.s. case no. 609 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 2400 of 2013, subject to the condition that the petitioner will remain physically present before the trial court once in a month on the date fixed for trial till the conclusion of the trial and one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the district concern. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6958 of 2013 Md. Aaquibe Jawed ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/24.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the student of Baliapur Institute of Technology at Dhanbad and his date of birth is 05.05.1995, he has just completed 18 years of age. It is also submitted that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co-accused, who has stated about the petitioner that the petitioner is his closed friend and also participated in the theft of the motorcycle. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but she has not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner and she has also accepted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, nothing has come against the petitioner. Considering the fact that name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 609 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 2400 of 2013, subject to the condition that the petitioner will remain physically present before the trial Court once in a month on the date fixed for trial till the conclusion of the trial and one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the District concern. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial