Elfbrandt Vs. Russell

Elfbrandt vs Russell

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-15-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100860

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100860
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-15-1964
Case Number: 378 U.S. 127
Subject: Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue: Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Elfbrandt

Respondent

Russell

Excerpt

elfbrandt v. russell - 378 u.s. 127 (1964) u.s. supreme court elfbrandt v. russell, 378 u.s. 127 (1964) 378 u.s. 127 elfbrandt v. russell et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona. no. 553, misc. decided june 15, 1964. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 94 ariz. 1, 381 p.2d 554. w. edward morgan for petitioner. robert w. pickrell, attorney general of arizona, philip m. haggerty, assistant attorney general, and norman e. green for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of arizona for further consideration in light of baggett v. bullitt, 377 u.s. 360 . page 378 u.s. 127, 128

Full Judgment

ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL - 378 U.S. 127 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL, 378 U.S. 127 (1964) 378 U.S. 127

ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 553, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554.

W. Edward Morgan for petitioner.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman E. Green for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 .

Page 378 U.S. 127, 128

Same Parties Elfbrandt vs Russell Same Subject Narcotics