Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 24, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008576

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 6977 of 2013 manoj singh ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... ... ... opposite party --- coram : hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy for the petitioner : mr. laljee sahay, advocate for the state : a. p. p. 02/24.07.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. the petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the arms act. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that according the allegation made in the f.i.r. one country made pistol loaded with 0.315 bore live cartridge has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. it is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2013 i.e. more than five months. learned counsel for the state has opposed but he has not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner. considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody of the petitioner i.e. more than five months, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned civil judge, jr. division, koderma in connection with domchanch p.s. case no. 32 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 222 of 2013, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the district concern. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6977 of 2013 Manoj Singh ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Laljee Sahay, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/24.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that according the allegation made in the F.I.R. one country made pistol loaded with 0.315 bore live cartridge has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2013 i.e. more than five months. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but he has not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody of the petitioner i.e. more than five months, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Civil Judge, Jr. Division, Koderma in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 222 of 2013, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the District concern. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial