Mohan Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Mohan Ram vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 24, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008532

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008532
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohan Ram

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 5349 of 2013 mohan ram ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. a.k. chaturvedi, advocate for the state : a.p.p. ------ 2/ 24.07.2013 it is mentioned in paragraph-25 of the bail application that a iron plate was fixed in right leg of the petitioner, due to which, he was suffering from post-traumatic pain and he is not getting proper treatment of his pains and problems in the jail. let a report be called for from the jail doctor of garhwa jail, in this regard. the report should also mention when the iron plate is to be removed. list this case after receipt of the said report. let this order be communicated to the superintendent of jail, garhwa, through fax at the cost of the petitioner. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5349 of 2013 Mohan Ram ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 24.07.2013 It is mentioned in paragraph-25 of the bail application that a iron plate was fixed in right leg of the petitioner, due to which, he was suffering from post-traumatic pain and he is not getting proper treatment of his pains and problems in the jail. Let a report be called for from the jail doctor of Garhwa Jail, in this regard. The report should also mention when the iron plate is to be removed. List this case after receipt of the said report. Let this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Jail, Garhwa, through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Mohan Ram vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education