Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors Vs. Bimla Devi and anr

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors vs Bimla Devi and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 26, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors

Respondent

Bimla Devi and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.c. no. 1375 of 2013 --- vijay kumar singh and ors. ..... petitioners versus bimla devi and anr. ...... respondents --- coram: honble mr. justice p.p. bhatt for the petitioners : mr. satish kumar deo, adv. for the respondent : mr. amar kumar sinha, vishal kuamr, adv. - -- order no.09 dated 26th july, 2013. the petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under article 227 to the constitution of india, have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 30.1.2013 passed by the court of civil judge, ii, gumla in t.s. no. 38/2002, whereby, the court below has rejected the petition filed under section 151 cr.p.c. heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. learned counsel for the respondents has referred to and relied upon a judgment delivered by the hon'ble apex court reported in the case of bagai construction through its proprietor mr. lalit begai vs. gupta building material store [2013(2) sccd 1074 sc)] and submitted that in view of the said judgment, this petition may be dismissed in limine. from perusal of the impugned order as well as other materials, placed on record, it appears that the court below after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case, has rejected the petition filed under section 151 c.p.c. and, therefore, the learned court below has not committed any error while passing the impugned order in exercise of the powers and jurisdiction vested with it. from perusal of the above said judgment cited by the learned counsel for the respondents, it also appears that the present petition deserves to be dismissed. in view of the above premises more particularly in view of the judgment cited above, the intervention of this court under article 227 of the constitution of india is not required. accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. anu /- (p.p. bhatt, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 1375 of 2013 --- Vijay Kumar Singh and Ors. ..... Petitioners Versus Bimla Devi and Anr. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT For the Petitioners : Mr. Satish Kumar Deo, Adv. For the respondent : Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Vishal Kuamr, Adv. - -- Order No.09 Dated 26th July, 2013. The petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 to the Constitution of India, have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 30.1.2013 passed by the Court of Civil Judge, II, Gumla in T.S. No. 38/2002, whereby, the court below has rejected the petition filed under Section 151 Cr.P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. Learned counsel for the respondents has referred to and relied upon a judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in the case of Bagai Construction through its Proprietor Mr. Lalit Begai Vs. Gupta Building Material Store [2013(2) SCCD 1074 SC)] and submitted that in view of the said judgment, this petition may be dismissed in limine. From perusal of the impugned order as well as other materials, placed on record, it appears that the court below after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case, has rejected the petition filed under Section 151 C.P.C. and, therefore, the learned court below has not committed any error while passing the impugned order in exercise of the powers and jurisdiction vested with it. From perusal of the above said judgment cited by the learned counsel for the respondents, it also appears that the present petition deserves to be dismissed. In view of the above premises more particularly in view of the judgment cited above, the intervention of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not required. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. Anu /- (P.P. Bhatt, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial