Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

PravIn Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

PravIn Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 26, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008467

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

PravIn Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.rev. no.444 of 2013 pravin kumar ................................. petitioner versus state of jharkhand .....................opposite party coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner:mr. rajesh kumar for the state : mr.shailesh 6/ 26.07.13. i.a.no.5162 of 2013 heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the vigilance on the interlocutory application bearing no.5163 of 2013. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier this application had been filed for quashing of the order wherein prayer for discharge has been rejected but while the matter was pending before this court, even the charges have been framed and therefore, that order by which charges have been framed has been challenged by way of interlocutory application and therefore, prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. the prayer made in the interlocutory application is hereby allowed. let the aforesaid i.a form part of the main application. cr.rev. no.444 of 2013 upon prayer made in the interlocutory application was allowed, mr.shailesh, learned counsel appearing for the vigilance submits that he needs to go through the case diary so as to be ascertained what are the materials against the petitioner and therefore, the matter be posted on 16.8.2013. the prayer is allowed. let this matter be listed on 16.8.2013 so that the matter be heard and be decided on that day itself. nd/ ( r.r. prasad, j.)

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.444 of 2013 Pravin Kumar ................................. Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand .....................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the State : Mr.Shailesh 6/ 26.07.13. I.A.No.5162 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance on the interlocutory application bearing no.5163 of 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier this application had been filed for quashing of the order wherein prayer for discharge has been rejected but while the matter was pending before this Court, even the charges have been framed and therefore, that order by which charges have been framed has been challenged by way of interlocutory application and therefore, prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. The prayer made in the interlocutory application is hereby allowed. Let the aforesaid I.A form part of the main application. Cr.Rev. No.444 of 2013 Upon prayer made in the interlocutory application was allowed, Mr.Shailesh, learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance submits that he needs to go through the case diary so as to be ascertained what are the materials against the petitioner and therefore, the matter be posted on 16.8.2013. The prayer is allowed. Let this matter be listed on 16.8.2013 so that the matter be heard and be decided on that day itself. ND/ ( R.R. Prasad, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial