Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Soni Parween Vs. Chief Secretory

Soni Parween vs Chief Secretory

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 26, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008431

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Soni Parween

Respondent

Chief Secretory

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi ---- w.p.(pil). no. 1896 of 2013 ---- soni parween . petitioner. versus state of jharkhand and ors. .. respondents. --- coram : hon'ble the chief justice hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy ----- for the petitioner : mr.amrita banerjee, advocate for the state : j.c. to a.g. for resp.no.4 : mr.rahul saboo, advocate. ----- order no. 02 dated :26. h july 2013 this petition has been filed by raising grievance regarding public nuisance for which, in our opinion, in the facts of this case, the proper remedy is under section 133 cr.p.c. or by filing civil suit against the erring parties, who are creating nuisance. therefore, in that fact situation, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may avail other remedy. the writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of. (prakash tatia, c.j.) ( jaya roy, j.) biswas/si

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(PIL). No. 1896 of 2013 ---- Soni Parween . Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. .. Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr.Amrita Banerjee, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.G. For Resp.No.4 : Mr.Rahul Saboo, Advocate. ----- Order No. 02 Dated :

26. h July 2013 This petition has been filed by raising grievance regarding public nuisance for which, in our opinion, in the facts of this case, the proper remedy is under Section 133 Cr.P.C. or by filing civil suit against the erring parties, who are creating nuisance. Therefore, in that fact situation, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may avail other remedy. The writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) ( Jaya Roy, J.) Biswas/SI

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial