Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Likhia Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Likhia Devi and ors vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 26, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008367

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Likhia Devi and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.c. no. 5893 of 2011 --- likhia devi and ors. ..... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand and ors. ...... respondents --- coram: honble mr. justice p.p. bhatt for the petitioners : m/s. r.p. gupta, sudha gupta, adv. for the respondent : j.c. to aag. - -- order no.04 dated 26th july, 2013. the petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under article 227 to the constitution of india, have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 3.9.2011 passed by learned sub judge-v, hazaribagh in title suit no. 142/2008 whereby, the court below has rejected the petition filed on 2.9.11 for appointment of pleader commissioner.. heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. from perusal of the reasons assigned by the learned court below, it appears that the court below after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case as well as documentary evidence and oral evidence available on record, has rejected the application filed by the petitioners for appointment of survey knowing pleader commissioner and, therefore, the learned court below has not committed any error while passing the impugned order in exercise of the powers and jurisdiction vested with it. in view of the above premises, the intervention of this court under article 227 of the constitution of india is not required. accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. anu /- (p.p. bhatt, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 5893 of 2011 --- Likhia Devi and Ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand and Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT For the Petitioners : M/s. R.P. Gupta, Sudha Gupta, Adv. For the respondent : J.C. to AAG. - -- Order No.04 Dated 26th July, 2013. The petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 to the Constitution of India, have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 3.9.2011 passed by learned Sub Judge-V, Hazaribagh in Title Suit No. 142/2008 whereby, the court below has rejected the petition filed on 2.9.11 for appointment of Pleader Commissioner.. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record. From perusal of the reasons assigned by the learned court below, It appears that the court below after careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case as well as documentary evidence and oral evidence available on record, has rejected the application filed by the petitioners for appointment of Survey knowing Pleader Commissioner and, therefore, the learned court below has not committed any error while passing the impugned order in exercise of the powers and jurisdiction vested with it. In view of the above premises, the intervention of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not required. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. Anu /- (P.P. Bhatt, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial