Mayer Vs. Rusk

Mayer vs Rusk

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100835

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100835
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-22-1964
Case Number: 378 U.S. 579
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mayer

Respondent

Rusk

Excerpt

mayer v. rusk - 378 u.s. 579 (1964) u.s. supreme court mayer v. rusk, 378 u.s. 579 (1964) 378 u.s. 579 mayer v. rusk, secretary of state. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 746. decided june 22, 1964. judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 224 f. supp. 929. david carliner, francis heisler, oliver stone and jack wasserman for appellant. solicitor general cox for appellee. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for consideration in light of aptheker v. secretary of state, ante, p. 500. mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white would affirm the judgment. page 378 u.s. 579, 580

Full Judgment

MAYER v. RUSK - 378 U.S. 579 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court MAYER v. RUSK, 378 U.S. 579 (1964) 378 U.S. 579

MAYER v. RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 746.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 F. Supp. 929.

David Carliner, Francis Heisler, Oliver Stone and Jack Wasserman for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment.

Page 378 U.S. 579, 580

Same Parties Mayer vs Rusk Same Subject Criminal