Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pea Vs. United States

Pea vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100832

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 571
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pea

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

pea v. united states - 378 u.s. 571 (1964) u.s. supreme court pea v. united states, 378 u.s. 571 (1964) 378 u.s. 571 pea v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 930, misc. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 116 u.s. app. d.c. 410, 324 f.2d 442 . henry lincoln johnson, jr. for petitioner. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, beatrice rosenberg and jerome nelson for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 571, 572

Full Judgment

PEA v. UNITED STATES - 378 U.S. 571 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court PEA v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 571 (1964) 378 U.S. 571

PEA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 930, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 116 U.S. App. D.C. 410, 324 F.2d 442 .

Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome Nelson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 571, 572



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial