Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Urmila Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Urmila Devi vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 23, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008229

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Urmila Devi

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 2979 of 2013 urmila devi ... ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. atanu banerjee for the state : mr. a.p.p. ........ 2/23.07.2013 it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already been arrested, thus this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2979 of 2013 Urmila Devi ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the State : Mr. A.P.P. ........ 2/23.07.2013 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already been arrested, thus this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Urmila Devi vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales