Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mitchell Vs. City of Charleston

Mitchell vs City of Charleston

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100813

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 551
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mitchell

Respondent

City of Charleston

Excerpt

mitchell v. city of charleston - 378 u.s. 551 (1964) u.s. supreme court mitchell v. city of charleston, 378 u.s. 551 (1964) 378 u.s. 551 mitchell et al. v. city of charleston. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of south carolina. no. 8. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 239 s. c. 376, 123 s. e. 2d 512. jack greenberg, constance baker motley, james m. nabrit iii, matthew j. perry, lincoln c. jenkins, jr. and john h. wrighten for petitioners. robert l. clement, jr. for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. bouie v. city of columbia, ante, p. 347. mr. justice douglas would reverse on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in bell v. maryland, ante, p. 242. mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent. page 378 u.s. 551, 552

Full Judgment

MITCHELL v. CITY OF CHARLESTON - 378 U.S. 551 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL v. CITY OF CHARLESTON, 378 U.S. 551 (1964) 378 U.S. 551

MITCHELL ET AL. v. CITY OF CHARLESTON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 8.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 239 S. C. 376, 123 S. E. 2d 512.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. and John H. Wrighten for petitioners.

Robert L. Clement, Jr. for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Bouie v. City of Columbia, ante, p. 347.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 551, 552



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial