Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Williams Vs. North Carolina

Williams vs North Carolina

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100810

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 548
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Williams

Respondent

North Carolina

Excerpt

williams v. north carolina - 378 u.s. 548 (1964) u.s. supreme court williams v. north carolina, 378 u.s. 548 (1964) 378 u.s. 548 williams v. north carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of north carolina. no. 4. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 253 n.c. 804, 117 s. e. 2d 824. leonard b. boudin, victor rabinowitz and conrad j. lynn for petitioner. t. w. bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and ralph moody, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the supreme court of north carolina for consideration in light of robinson v. florida, ante, p. 153. mr. justice douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in bell v. maryland, ante, p. 242. mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent. page 378 u.s. 548, 549

Full Judgment

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA - 378 U.S. 548 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964) 378 U.S. 548

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 4.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 N.C. 804, 117 S. E. 2d 824.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 548, 549



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial