Md Anwar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md Anwar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 29, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008097

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008097
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Anwar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....no. 1469 of 2012. the case relates to dacoity, in which, haiwa vehicle was taken away by the culprits after committing murder of the driver of the vehicle. learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. it has also been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner md. jamil @ sk. jamil that there is only confessional statement of this petitioner and there is no other material against him. learned counsel for the state, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that the confessional statement of petitioner md. anwar and md. akhtar had led to the recovery of the looted vehicle and so far as petitioner md. jamil is concerned, it is submitted that there is only confessional statement and his implication was found by some call details. in the facts of this case, i am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners, md. anwar @ md. anwar alam and md. akhtar, on bail. accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. so far as petitioner, md. jamil @ sk. jamil, is cocnerned, he is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned sessions judge, godda, in connection with s.t. no. 105 of 2013, arising out of lalmatia p.s. case no. 80 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 1469 of 2012. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2105 of 2013 Md. Anwar @ Md. Anwar Alam Versus The State of Jharkhand with B. A. No. 4007 o”

1. Md. Akhtar 2. Md. Jamil @ Sk. Jamil Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : M/s K.P. Deo & D.K. Dubey, Advocates For the State : A.P.P. -------- 3/ 29.07.2013 Both these bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 395, 396 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Lalmatiya P.S. Case No. 80 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1469 of 2012. The case relates to dacoity, in which, Haiwa vehicle was taken away by the culprits after committing murder of the driver of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner Md. Jamil @ Sk. Jamil that there is only confessional statement of this petitioner and there is no other material against him. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that the confessional statement of petitioner Md. Anwar and Md. Akhtar had led to the recovery of the looted vehicle and so far as petitioner Md. Jamil is concerned, it is submitted that there is only confessional statement and his implication was found by some call details. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Md. Anwar @ Md. Anwar Alam and Md. Akhtar, on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. So far as petitioner, Md. Jamil @ Sk. Jamil, is cocnerned, he is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Godda, in connection with S.T. No. 105 of 2013, arising out of Lalmatia P.S. Case No. 80 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1469 of 2012. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Md Anwar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education