Drews Vs. Maryland

Drews vs Maryland

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100809

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100809
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-22-1964
Case Number: 378 U.S. 547
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Drews

Respondent

Maryland

Excerpt

drews v. maryland - 378 u.s. 547 (1964) u.s. supreme court drews v. maryland, 378 u.s. 547 (1964) 378 u.s. 547 drews et al. v. maryland. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 3. decided june 22, 1964. judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 224 md. 186, 167 a. 2d 341. robert b. watts, francis d. murnaghan, jr. and jack greenberg for appellants. thomas b. finan, attorney general of maryland, and joseph s. kaufman, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals of maryland for consideration in light of griffin v. maryland, ante, p. 130, and bell v. maryland, ante, p. 226. mr. justice douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in bell v. maryland, ante, p. 242. mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent. page 378 u.s. 547, 548

Full Judgment

DREWS v. MARYLAND - 378 U.S. 547 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DREWS v. MARYLAND, 378 U.S. 547 (1964) 378 U.S. 547

DREWS ET AL. v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 3.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 Md. 186, 167 A. 2d 341.

Robert B. Watts, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. and Jack Greenberg for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland for consideration in light of Griffin v. Maryland, ante, p. 130, and Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 547, 548

Same Parties Drews vs Maryland Same Subject Land Acquisition