Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Barnwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Sanjay Kumar Barnwal vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008063

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar Barnwal

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi i.a. no. 3402 of 2013 in criminal appeal (db) no. 324 of 2013 sanjay kumar barnwal appellant versus the state of jharkhand & ors. respondent --------- coram: honble mr. justice d.n. patel hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar --------- for the appellant : mr. mukesh kumar, advocate for the state : a.p.p. --------- th 05/dated:30. july, 2013 per d.n. patel, j.: i.a. no. 3402 o”1. this interlocutory application has been preferred under section 5 of the limitation act for condonation of delay of 11 days in filing this criminal appeal.2. having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially paragraph no.-7, it appears that there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay of 11 days. hence, we hereby condone the delay in preferring this criminal appeal. accordingly, i.a. no. 3402 of 2013 stands allowed and disposed of. criminal appeal (db) no. 324 of 2013 registry is directed to enlist this criminal appeal on the board of admission on 12th august, 2013. (d.n. patel, j.) (shree chandrashekhar, j.) tanuj/ satyarthi

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 3402 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 324 of 2013 Sanjay Kumar Barnwal Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondent --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --------- For the Appellant : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- th 05/Dated:

30. July, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J.: I.A. No. 3402 o”

1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 11 days in filing this criminal appeal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially paragraph no.-7, it appears that there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay of 11 days. Hence, we hereby condone the delay in preferring this criminal appeal. Accordingly, I.A. No. 3402 of 2013 stands allowed and disposed of. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 324 of 2013 Registry is directed to enlist this criminal appeal on the board of Admission on 12th August, 2013. (D.N. Patel, J.) (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) Tanuj/ satyarthi

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial