Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bedani Devi Vs. Collectariate

Bedani Devi vs Collectariate

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008026

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bedani Devi

Respondent

Collectariate

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(pil) no. 2007 of 2013 bedani devi ...... petitioner vrs. the state of jharkhand and others ...... respondents ------ coram: honble the chief justice honble mrs. justice jaya roy ------ for the petitioner : mr. b.k. dubey, adv. for the respondents: j.c. to a.g. dated 30th july, 2013. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition. in view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn for which the respondents have no objection. (prakash tatia,c.j.) (jaya roy, j.) sudhir

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 2007 of 2013 Bedani Devi ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. B.K. Dubey, Adv. For the Respondents: J.C. to A.G. Dated 30th July, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn for which the respondents have no objection. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial