Md AlimuddIn Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Md Alimuddin vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008002

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008002
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Alimuddin

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no. 984 of 2013 md. alimuddin @ alimuddin ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & others.. ... ... opposite parties --- coram : hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy for the petitioner : mr. amit sinha, advocate for the state : a. p. p. i.a. no. 5150 o”06. 26.07.2013 petitioner has filed this limitation application for condoning the delay of 1523 days in filing the restoration application for bearing cr.m.p. no. 984 of 2013. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has no information regarding the dismissal of the aforesaid cr. revision no. 331 of 2007 and the said revision application has been dismissed for default due to non-compliance of the part of the order dated 19.12.2008. as the sufficient cause has been shown by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the delay in filing in the instant cr.m.p. no. 984 of 2013 is condoned. accordingly, i.a. no. 5150 of 2013 is allowed. cr.m.p. no. 984 of 2013 as the petitioner has already complied part of the order within time, the cr.m.p. no. 984 of 2013 is allowed and cr. revision no. 331 of 2007 is restored to its original position. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2013 Md. Alimuddin @ Alimuddin ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others.. ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. I.A. No. 5150 o”

06. 26.07.2013 Petitioner has filed this limitation application for condoning the delay of 1523 days in filing the restoration application for bearing Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has no information regarding the dismissal of the aforesaid Cr. Revision No. 331 of 2007 and the said Revision application has been dismissed for default due to non-compliance of the part of the order dated 19.12.2008. As the sufficient cause has been shown by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the delay in filing in the instant Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2013 is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 5150 of 2013 is allowed. Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2013 As the petitioner has already complied part of the order within time, the Cr.M.P. No. 984 of 2013 is allowed and Cr. Revision No. 331 of 2007 is restored to its original position. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Md Alimuddin vs State of Jharkhand and ors Same Subject Land Acquisition