Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shanti Devi Vs. District Administration

Shanti Devi vs District Administration

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007996

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shanti Devi

Respondent

District Administration

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 6750 of 2012 --- shanti devi --- --- ---- petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & others --- --- --- respondents --- coram: the honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner: mr. manoj kr. sah, advocate for the state: jc to gp-vi --- 05/ 30.07.2013 heard counsel for the parties.2. the simple grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that a bank draft of rs. 58,464/- which was submitted by the husband of the petitioner for lifting wheat and rice for public distribution shop in the year 2007-08 is not being returned to her in spite of the fact that the said material could not be lifted as her husband died on 17th february 2008.3. according to the petitioner, vide annexure-2, the sub divisional officer, godda has advised the son of the present petitioner to approach the district manager, state food corporation, sahibganj for return of the aforesaid draft.4. having heard counsel for the parties, this court without getting into the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 6 - the district manager, department of state food limited, sahibganj with a representation seeking refund of the said amount claimed to be deposited by her husband, with all supporting facts and documents. on receipt of such representation, the respondent no. 6 shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass necessary order within a period of six weeks thereafter. if the petitioner is found entitled to such refund, the same may be made upon proper verification of the identity of the petitioner that she is the wife of the deceased, within two weeks thereafter. (aparesh kumar singh, j) ranjeet/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6750 of 2012 --- Shanti Devi --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State: JC to GP-VI --- 05/ 30.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The simple grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that a Bank Draft of Rs. 58,464/- which was submitted by the husband of the petitioner for lifting wheat and rice for public distribution shop in the year 2007-08 is not being returned to her in spite of the fact that the said material could not be lifted as her husband died on 17th February 2008.

3. According to the petitioner, vide Annexure-2, the Sub Divisional Officer, Godda has advised the son of the present petitioner to approach the District Manager, State Food Corporation, Sahibganj for return of the aforesaid draft.

4. Having heard counsel for the parties, this Court without getting into the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Respondent No. 6 - The District Manager, Department of State Food Limited, Sahibganj with a representation seeking refund of the said amount claimed to be deposited by her husband, with all supporting facts and documents. On receipt of such representation, the respondent no. 6 shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass necessary order within a period of six weeks thereafter. If the petitioner is found entitled to such refund, the same may be made upon proper verification of the identity of the petitioner that she is the wife of the deceased, within two weeks thereafter. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial