Subodh Kumar Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Subodh Kumar Singh and anr vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1007992
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subodh Kumar Singh and anr

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.5687of2013 1.subodhkumarsingh 2.niranjansingh petitioners versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.r.s.mazumdar,sr.advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 02/30.07.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. itrevealsfromthef.i.r.thatpetitionershavesoldgairmazarualandto theinformantcompanyandrealisedmoney. thisfactwasdetectedwhenthe companyappliedformutationofthelandpurchasedfromthesepetitioners. itissubmittedthatpetitionershavenointentiontocheattheinformant. asamatteroffact,therentreceiptwasbeingissuedforthesaidlandinthe nameoftheirfatherandtheyhadbeencominginpossessionoverthelandin question since from 1961. only because the mutation has been refused, petitionerscannotbeheldliablefortheoffenceofcheating. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. consideringfactsandcircumstancesaswellasdetentionofpetitionersin custody,theyaredirectedto bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondof rs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand)eachwithtwosuretiesofthelikeamount each to the satisfaction of the court of sri satyakam priyadarshi, learned judicialmagistrate1st class,hazaribaghinconnectionwithpatratu(bhadani nagar)p.s.caseno.201of2012correspondingtog.r.caseno.3979of2012. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5687of2013 1.SubodhKumarSingh 2.NiranjanSingh Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr.Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/30.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatpetitionershavesoldGairMazarualandto theinformantcompanyandrealisedmoney. Thisfactwasdetectedwhenthe companyappliedformutationofthelandpurchasedfromthesepetitioners. Itissubmittedthatpetitionershavenointentiontocheattheinformant. Asamatteroffact,therentreceiptwasbeingissuedforthesaidlandinthe nameoftheirfatherandtheyhadbeencominginpossessionoverthelandin question since from 1961. Only because the mutation has been refused, petitionerscannotbeheldliablefortheoffenceofcheating. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringfactsandcircumstancesaswellasdetentionofpetitionersin custody,theyaredirectedto bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondof Rs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)eachwithtwosuretiesofthelikeamount each to the satisfaction of the Court of Sri Satyakam Priyadarshi, learned JudicialMagistrate1st Class,HazaribaghinconnectionwithPatratu(Bhadani Nagar)P.S.CaseNo.201of2012correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.3979of2012. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Subodh Kumar Singh and anr vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education