Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Veena Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Veena Devi vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007976

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Veena Devi

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.s. no. 219 of 2010 veena devi ..petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & ors. .respondents ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : mr. sanjeev kumar mishra, advocate for the respondents : j.c. to g.p. iii --- i.a. no. 4730 o”14. 30-07-2013 in this i.a., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of w.p.s. no. 219 of 2010. it has been submitted that petitioner is a lady and the matter is pending since 2010. the matter is regarding her appointment. the petitioner has been facing hardship. the writ petition requires to be heard at an early date. learned j.c. to g.p. iii has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of the writ petition. considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this i.a. is allowed. office is directed to list w.p.s. no. 219 of 2010 under the heading "for admission" on 24th september, 2013. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 219 of 2010 Veena Devi ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P. III --- I.A. No. 4730 o”

14. 30-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No. 219 of 2010. It has been submitted that petitioner is a lady and the matter is pending since 2010. The matter is regarding her appointment. The petitioner has been facing hardship. The writ petition requires to be heard at an early date. Learned J.C. to G.P. III has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of the writ petition. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 219 of 2010 under the heading "For Admission" on 24th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Veena Devi vs State of Jharkhand and ors Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales