Santosh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Santosh Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 25, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1007803
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 25, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santosh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.5620of2013 santoshkumar petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.umeshkumarchoubey,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 02/25.07.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. it reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingtheinformantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry. itisalsoalleged that the informant was subjected to assault by the petitioner while she was pregnant. itissubmittedthatthiscasehasbeenlodgedbecausepetitionerhadgone todelhitoworkandhewasnotinapositiontokeepthecomplainantwithhim atdelhi.heisincustodysincelastfourmonths. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. considering matrimonial nature of the offence as well as period of detention of petitioner in custody, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand)withtwosuretiesof thelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthecourtofmiss.divyamishra, learned judicial magistrate 1st class, hazaribagh in connection with mahila (sadar)p.s.caseno.06of2013correspondingtog.r.caseno.360of2013. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5620of2013 SantoshKumar Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.UmeshKumarChoubey,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/25.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingtheinformantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry. Itisalsoalleged that the informant was subjected to assault by the petitioner while she was pregnant. Itissubmittedthatthiscasehasbeenlodgedbecausepetitionerhadgone toDelhitoworkandhewasnotinapositiontokeepthecomplainantwithhim atDelhi.Heisincustodysincelastfourmonths. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Considering matrimonial nature of the offence as well as period of detention of petitioner in custody, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesof thelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtofMiss.DivyaMishra, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Mahila (Sadar)P.S.CaseNo.06of2013correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.360of2013. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Santosh Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal