Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vimla Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Vimla Devi vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 25, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007746

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vimla Devi

Advocate Sri. Ramawatar Sharma

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....affection and dignity. it is also submitted that petitioners are ready to give written undertaking in the court below in this respect. learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that his client is also ready to reside with the petitioners, if petitioners give written undertaking that they will keep informant with all love and affection and will not torture her in future. in view of the aforesaid submission, i allow these anticipatory bail applications and direct petitioners to surrender in the court below on 06.08.2013. on that day, informant is directed to remain physically present in the court below. the learned court below is directed to enlarge petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned sub divisional judicial magistrate, bermo at tenughat, in connection with chandrapura p.s. case no. 16 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 207 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. the learned court below is further directed to send informant along with petitioners after taking written undertaking from the petitioners that they will not torture or demand dowry from the informant in future. if informant has any grievance in future, she will file an application in the court below for cancellation of bail of petitioners. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1726 of 2013 Vimala Devi Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Oppsite Party WITH A.B.A. No. 2436 of 2013 Upasna Arya @ Upasna Devi Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party WITH A.B.A. No. 2515 of 2013 Vikash Kumar Arya Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Ramawatar Sharma, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. For the Informant : - Mr. Deepak Kr. Prasad, Advocate. 05/25.07.2013 All the three anticipatory bail applications arose from the same first information report, thus, are heard together and disposed of by this order. Heard Sri Ramawatar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Deepak Kumar Prasad, learned counsel for the opposite party no.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are ready to keep informant Kusum Devi, as wife of Petitioner no. 3-Vikash Kumar Arya with all love, affection and dignity. It is also submitted that petitioners are ready to give written undertaking in the court below in this respect. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that his client is also ready to reside with the petitioners, if petitioners give written undertaking that they will keep informant with all love and affection and will not torture her in future. In view of the aforesaid submission, I allow these anticipatory bail applications and direct petitioners to surrender in the court below on 06.08.2013. On that day, informant is directed to remain physically present in the court below. The learned court below is directed to enlarge petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Chandrapura P.S. Case No. 16 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 207 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The learned court below is further directed to send informant along with petitioners after taking written undertaking from the petitioners that they will not torture or demand dowry from the informant in future. If informant has any grievance in future, she will file an application in the court below for cancellation of bail of petitioners. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial