Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dinesh Kumar Sah Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Dinesh Kumar Sah vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 05, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007697

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh Kumar Sah

Advocate Sri. Peeyush K. Choudhary

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 1107 of 2013 dinesh kumar sah ... ... ... petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand 2.namita devi ... ... opp. parties coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. peeyush k. choudhary for the state : ms. anita sinha, a.p.p. for the o.p. no.-2 mr. manoj kumar sah ........ 4/05.08.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by dinesh kumar sah is moved by sri peeyush k. choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by ms. anita sinha, learned additional pp. for the state and sri manoj kumar sah, learned counsel for the informant/opposite party no.2. there is general allegation against all accused persons that they have tortured informant. it appears that petitioner is ready to keep informant as his wife, but informant is not willing to reside with petitioner. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 17th of august 2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned s.d.j.m. godda, in connection with mahagama p.s. case no. 15 of 2013, corresponding to g.r. no. 126 of 2013 (p.c. r. case no. 763 of 2012), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1107 of 2013 Dinesh Kumar Sah ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Namita Devi ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Peeyush K. Choudhary For the State : Ms. Anita Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.-2 Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah ........ 4/05.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar Sah is moved by Sri Peeyush K. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Ms. Anita Sinha, learned Additional PP. for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar Sah, learned counsel for the informant/opposite party No.

2. There is general allegation against all accused persons that they have tortured informant. It appears that petitioner is ready to keep informant as his wife, but informant is not willing to reside with petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 17th of August 2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Godda, in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 15 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 126 of 2013 (P.C. R. Case No. 763 of 2012), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial