Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Prashant Kumar Dutta Vs. State of Jharkhand

Prashant Kumar Dutta vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007678

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashant Kumar Dutta

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. m.p. no.2397 of 2012 prashant kumar dutta . petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & anr. opp. parties ----- coram: honble mr. justice r.r. prasad ----- for the petitioner : mr. a.k. sahani. advocate for the state : app for the o.p. no.2 : mr. amaresh kumar, advocate ----- 02/05.08.2013: having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, i do not find any illegality with the order taking cognizance dated 23.08.2012 passed in khunti p.s. case no.47 of 2011 (g.r. no.115 of 2011) whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence under sections 323 and 504 of the indian penal code has been taken against the petitioner and, therefore, order taking cognizance never warrants to be interfered with. however, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the points, which have been raised in this application, at an appropriate stage. with the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. (r.r. prasad, j.) ravi/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.2397 of 2012 Prashant Kumar Dutta . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani. Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate ----- 02/05.08.2013: Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, I do not find any illegality with the order taking cognizance dated 23.08.2012 passed in Khunti P.S. Case No.47 of 2011 (G.R. No.115 of 2011) whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner and, therefore, order taking cognizance never warrants to be interfered with. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the points, which have been raised in this application, at an appropriate stage. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. (R.R. Prasad, J.) Ravi/

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Prashant Kumar Dutta vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education
Education high court penal code The State Has been

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales