Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajiv Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Rajiv Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 01, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajiv Kumar Singh

Advocate Sri. Sanjay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a.no. 2724 of 2013. ----- rajiv kumar singh petitioner. versus the state of jharkhand opposite party. ..... coram : the hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar. ----- for the petitioner : sri sanjay kumar for the state : sri h.k.shikarwar, a.p.p. ----- 04/01.08.2013. anticipatory bail application filed by rajiv kumar singh is moved by sri sanjay kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri h.k. shikarwar, addl.p.p. for the state. from perusal of statement of complainant on s.a., i find that no specific overt act alleged against this petitioner. considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 16.08.2013. if petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, madhupur in connection with c.p. case no.240/2011, t.r. no.1168/2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. ( prashant kumar, j.) pramanik/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2724 of 2013. ----- Rajiv Kumar Singh Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Sanjay Kumar For the State : Sri H.K.Shikarwar, A.P.P. ----- 04/01.08.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Rajiv Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri H.K. Shikarwar, Addl.P.P. for the State. From perusal of statement of complainant on S.A., I find that no specific overt act alleged against this petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 16.08.2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur in connection with C.P. case no.240/2011, T.R. No.1168/2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) Pramanik/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial