Ravindra Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ravindra Kumar and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 08, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007549

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1007549
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 08, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravindra Kumar and ors

Advocate Sri. Mahesh Tewari, Sri. M.B.Lal

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....m.b.lal, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by sri manoj kumar no.2, addl.p.p. for the state. from perusal of statement of complainant on s.a., i find that there is general allegations against all the accused persons that they demanded dowry and assaulted complainant for the said demand. it appears that other co-accused namely, mithu devi, sonam devi and ravi kumar ram @ ravi kumar have been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 05.02.2013 in a.b.a.no. 4294/2012. it also appears from the impugned order of a.b.a.no.2395/2013 that petitioner has filed application for restitution of conjugal right . petitioner ravindra kumar is still ready to keep the complainant as his wife with honour and dignity. learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant is not ready to reside with the petitioner because ravindra kumar has solemnized second marriage, however, no proof of second marriage has been produced by the complainant. considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 21/08/2013. if petitioners surrender by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, named above, on bail,

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1064 of 2013. ----- 1.Ravindra Kumar 2.Chandrawati Devi @ Chandrawali Devi 3.Ugra Prasad @ Ugrah Prasad Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Reshma Devi Opposite Party. ..... With A.B.A.No. 2395 of 2013 Bharti Kumari Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.Party. Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : M /s Mahesh Tewari & M.B.Lal For the State : Sri Manoj Kumar no.2., A.P.P. ----- 04/08.08.2013. Both the application arose from same complaint case, thus are heard together and disposed of by this order. Anticipatory bail applications being A.B.A.No.1074/2013 filed by Ravindra Kumar,Chandrawati Devi @ Chandrawali Devi and Ugra Prasad @ Ugrah Prasad and A.B.A No. 23905/2013 filed by Bharti Kumari, is moved by Sri Mahesh Tewari and Sri M.B.Lal, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri Manoj Kumar no.2, Addl.P.P. for the State. From perusal of statement of complainant on S.A., I find that there is general allegations against all the accused persons that they demanded dowry and assaulted complainant for the said demand. It appears that other co-accused namely, Mithu Devi, Sonam Devi and Ravi Kumar Ram @ Ravi Kumar have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2013 in A.B.A.No. 4294/2012. It also appears from the impugned order of A.B.A.No.2395/2013 that petitioner has filed application for restitution of conjugal right . Petitioner Ravindra Kumar is still ready to keep the complainant as his wife with honour and dignity. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant is not ready to reside with the petitioner because Ravindra Kumar has solemnized second marriage, however, no proof of second marriage has been produced by the complainant. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 21/08/2013. If petitioners surrender by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, named above, on bail,

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Ravindra Kumar and ors vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education