Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Robinson Vs. United States

Robinson vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-18-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100685

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
372 U.S. 527
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robinson

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

robinson v. united states - 372 u.s. 527 (1963) u.s. supreme court robinson v. united states, 372 u.s. 527 (1963) 372 u.s. 527 robinson v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. no. 425, misc. decided march 18, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded with directions to allow appeal in forma pauperis. reported below: 304 f.2d 805 . petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, robert s. erdahl and kirby w. patterson for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. on writ of certiorari the judgment is vacated and, in accordance with the suggestion of the solicitor general, the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit with directions to allow the appeal in forma pauperis. coppedge v. united states, 369 u.s. 438 . page 372 u.s. 527, 528

Full Judgment

ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES - 372 U.S. 527 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 527 (1963) 372 U.S. 527

ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 425, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded with directions to allow appeal in forma pauperis.

Reported below: 304 F.2d 805 .

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Robert S. Erdahl and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. On writ of certiorari the judgment is vacated and, in accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with directions to allow the appeal in forma pauperis. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 .

Page 372 U.S. 527, 528



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial